|
|
|
|
|
|
by jmtame
6517 days ago
|
|
|
If you want to look at a company like Google, at least mention that they're generating $16 billion in revenue a year. Yes, they took 10 years, but look at the power of their brand, all of the applications they've built and gotten into the marketplace, plus all of their revenue. They're also "the best place to work at" (so you know they're doing a lot more than just product development). Google isn't just a search company anymore, and that's not what they've been spending all of their time doing since 1996. 10 years? You better have something extremely impressive if you're given THAT much time. How did this get so many votes up? Is the HN community getting soft or what? ;) (I can sense the massive downvotes on this response already) |
|
|
Yet, your argument is inline with what the article says. It took Google 10 years for them to become a HUGE success. During this 10 years they probably have worked really hard everyday, and they're all brilliant people. For less talented people it probably takes even longer.
I guess your point is if you're just gonna do a declicious-scale success it doesn't take that long. YouTube even just took a year. But look at how much experience they have under their belt before that. It really depends on where you start counting that 10 years.
The article doesn't specify either, though. It's kind of vague.