|
|
|
|
|
by DocTomoe
1854 days ago
|
|
Call me naive, but wouldn't this be a lot easier - and more low-tech, thus cheaper, to sort by size with a sieve, then weight individual size-bags, and divide by the size of one pearl? Assuming all pearls have comparative density. |
|
The alternative here is to point the phone at a table.
The labour costs are relatively high and dominate most business costs. $100/mth is a rounding error in comparison. If you saved 4h of median-us-wage of work a month, it's free.