|
|
|
|
|
by sellyme
1856 days ago
|
|
Of course, but $100 per year to do the same is an even better deal. I can only assume that their support for custom requests is absolutely incredible, because it should be pretty trivial for any potential competitor to put up a similar concept for a tenth of the price and still be making a profit. But that's always the case with enterprise software I suppose. The improvement from 98% to 100% "quality" (whatever that means) is well worth a drastic price hike for most businesses. |
|
Then you look at their site and all the domains of application. My guess is they probably use a variety of models to get 100%: edge detection, CNN-style object detection, all sorts. And then aggregate/choose between the resulting predictions. Then they will probably have some layers of geometrical estimators.
The challenge here is 100% and on a wide variety of images. They'll need to maintain and collect data across a lot of domains, and find ways of coping with non-ideal ("in the field") input.