|
|
|
|
|
by slver
1858 days ago
|
|
That's the whole point. They're illegal/immoral, but decentralization means you can't mitigate them despite that. Tell me when is the last time a drug dealer used a wire transfer with reason "for the cocain"? Oh they don't do that. I wonder why. |
|
And there are benefits to being able to stop governments from controlling people. I would say the benefits of this far outweigh giving the state an even greater power advantage over non-state actors that may be acting maliciously.
So for me, yes, decentralization please.