Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by AretNCarlsen 5465 days ago
The article defines "making history" as simply existing. That's why they can conclude that disproportionate chunks of history were formed during more recent time periods: human population growth, like that of any other bacteria, is exponential.

It's an interesting perspective. Even if your definition of who "makes history" is more narrow, their results are still accurate if you assume that the history-makers have made up a consistent percentage of the human population throughout history.

1 comments

Yeah, but then they aren't really saying anything more than was already said with the "12% of the population of mankind is alive today".