Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by eikenberry 1855 days ago
Considering some states have already removed this immunity and others are considering it, I don't think it is required. That is to say that the state can and does bring charges for violations done while performing work for the state.
1 comments

That’s fair. I should say instead the historical basis for such protections is rooted in logic similar to what I wrote.