[podric]

I can see many use cases: - A woman going home late after a night out needing to walk thru a dangerous neighborhood - Elderly Asian person who needs to withdraw money from a bank - Urban photographer who wants to photograph abandoned buildings but is afraid of squatters/gangs - Woman who needs to go to a heavily-protested abortion clinic - Owner of a store that is about to get looted in a riot - Owner of a store who needs security personnel at peak shoplifting hours - Owner of a late night restaurant who needs security personnel at peak violent drunk people hours

[asdff]

These aren't practical or realistic use cases, though, and many are already covered by the existing private security industry.

An uber ride is cheaper than hiring private security to walk you through the hood. An elderly asian person is more likely to die crossing the road to a bank than be robbed at a bank. Urban photographers who wouldn't already be operating with a small crew are probably too broke to hire a bodyguard, nor is there some big wave or urban photographers being targeted currently. Chances are if that gear is your work its also already insured. The store owner probably already hires private security for not much more than minimum wage, and in the case of a looting, chances are the store owner would rather you go home and have insurance pay for the damages, than deal with the legal headache of their hired gun potentially killing someone in their store. Keep in mind when D.C. police who were defending the capitol building faced a mob, they allowed them to breach the building. I doubt private security is going to stick out their neck for your little shop more than D.C. police did for the U.S. capitol. You probably aren't hiring Blackwater mercenaries. The owner of the bar is paying their bouncers under the table already, the last thing they want is some pricey contract for a job they are already getting done just fine.

[podric]

An elderly asian person is more likely to die crossing the road to a bank than be robbed at a bank.

I don't think you've been keeping up with the news of the wave of attacks targeting Asian elders. Many of them have been beaten and robbed on the way to run errands.

in the case of a looting, chances are the store owner would rather you go home and have insurance pay for the damages, than deal with the legal headache of their hired gun potentially killing someone in their store.

You're way overestimating the number of small business owners who have sufficient insurance to cover a looting event, and way underestimating the extent to which small business owners are willing to protect their store (e.g. Roof Koreans)

Keep in mind when D.C. police who were defending the capitol building faced a mob, they allowed them to breach the building

That actually demonstrates the value provided by an app offering on-demand private security. When cops failed to stop the insurrectionists, they faced minimal negative consequences. On the other hand, if your hired private security fails to stop looters, they can expect a negative review from you on the app which in turn threatens their career on the app.

The owner of the bar is paying their bouncers under the table already

I said late night restaurants, not bars. When was the last time you've seen a bouncer at a late night restaurant?

I agree that some of the cases I brought up are a bit far fetched. That being said, here's a great use case that I'm sure we can both agree on for on-demand security:

- Domestic violence prevention. In cases where a spouse feels threatened but does not have enough evidence for the cops to get involved, on-demand private security is the best option.

A tragedy like the Adam Matos case would have been prevented had the victim used on-demand private security. The victim was threatened by Matos, her ex, and she called the cops, who didn't/couldn't do anything, which resulted in her and her family being killed by said ex within 24 hours.