[ekzy]

I like tailwind too but it's not an alternative to learning CSS. You still need to know CSS to be able to use tailwind

[domano]

I agree with your first sentence, but not with your second.

For my own homepage i did not write a single line of css.

I am very, very bad with CSS and can't wrap my head around it, but tailwind allowed me to create a very pretty, responsive homepage with very high lighthouse scores (bought tailwind UI too).

[deergomoo]

> I am very, very bad with CSS and can't wrap my head around it, but tailwind allowed me to create a very pretty, responsive homepage

Congrats, you now know CSS! It sounds like I'm joking but honestly, Tailwind is essentially composable shorthand for CSS with a design system applied. If you grok Tailwind, you understand the concepts of CSS, you just might not know the full names for all the properties and values.

[domano]

Yes, but when i try to apply this knowledge i fail every time.

I do unterstand the basic ideas behind CSS, but is just cant apply it. Tailwind allowed me to apply it.

If i could, i would prefer to write CSS! After 10 years i have given up though.

[dmitriid]

That's the thing about Tailwind. It's (almost) the right abstraction.

Personal anecdote, I understood how flexbox works only after using Tailwind for a personal project.

[umut]

Yes, very true.. But you just don't need to maintain the exploding specificity hell, instead use a declarative workflow, which is significantly easier to reason about.