|
|
|
|
|
|
by dragontamer
1862 days ago
|
|
|
Lets change the order of things then. 1. Take a picture of the tree 2. Create NFT of the picture of the tree. 3. Use the NFT of the picture of the tree to certify the CO2 offset. 4. Burn down the tree. -------- Is it more obvious with this ordering? The NFT proves nothing. It doesn't matter when you burn (or otherwise damage) the tree. You have an NFT stating a carbon offset that is completely fake. I'm just making fun of the idea that NFTs prove... anything useful... in these circumstances. Its the same thing as people who want to use blockchain to certify supply chains or whatever. The "Blockchain technology" doesn't do anything aside from provide marketing points. |
|
|