No, it's purely about AIs and the control problem.
The problem boils down to "How can I control superior AIs through mere power of inferior humans?".
The assumption is that the superhuman nature means there is no way disable a superhuman AI because deactivation will not fulfill its cost function and therefore must be avoided at all costs, the superhuman AI will always outsmart humans and prevent deactivation, the same way a skilled soldier will always beat an untrained civilian in combat.
We have solved it for humans by accepting that the victor gets to lead humanity. Can we accept AI rule? Probably not.
Even so bitcoin takes it to its logical extreme. You put valuable resources in one end and get money out the other side. In between, no useful work is done. It's the essence of capitalism without any of the beneficial side effects we've come to expect.
The problem boils down to "How can I control superior AIs through mere power of inferior humans?".
The assumption is that the superhuman nature means there is no way disable a superhuman AI because deactivation will not fulfill its cost function and therefore must be avoided at all costs, the superhuman AI will always outsmart humans and prevent deactivation, the same way a skilled soldier will always beat an untrained civilian in combat.
We have solved it for humans by accepting that the victor gets to lead humanity. Can we accept AI rule? Probably not.