Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by abeppu 1859 days ago
Should you always be able to sort results by date? If I search for "California", doesn't really ever make sense to date-sort all the pages that match?
2 comments

Is a good way to find things you had seen in the past, but don't recall exact date.
The range filter exists for that.

Sorting by date wouldn't work for that. You'll have a ridiculous number of pages of oldest search results (or newest, depending on sort order).

It depends what you're searching for. And searching within a range yielding lots of unsorted results is often unhelpful too. Of course, you can get around this with the API, but that is a lot of extra work for a student or non-computational researcher if they don't happen to already have those skills.
Within the range, the results are sorted by relevance.
Yes, that's what I'm complaining about. Pagerank's idea of relevance is often not what I need.
But if it is sorted by range, you can start binary searching on events.

I do this quite often with photos.

Sure it does. I might want things written about California in the past week, or in October last year, or in 2005.
You can already do that on Google -- press "Tools", then use the dropdown to change "Any Time" to "Past Week", or use the Custom Range option to select whatever time period you want.

The question is whether you should also be able to do a strict order by date, without regard to ranking. I'm not sure if you'd ever really want that.

---

[1] California in the past week: https://www.google.com/search?q=california&tbs=qdr:w

[2] California in October of last year: https://www.google.com/search?q=california&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_...

Yes, I use the filtering tool all the time. As a use case, consider where you're trying to find information about an incident or criminal case, where you can specify your search quite narrowly. But although news reports generally have the publication date extracted (and highlighted) as metadata by Google, There's no way to sort on this. It's a huge pain in the ass from a research perspective, because reports of crimes and arrests usually get far less coverage than reports of sentences or appeals, so the top results tend to more sensational but less informative.
s/less/more, sorry for the confusion.