|
|
|
|
|
by viseztrance
1862 days ago
|
|
I ignored systemd because I thought it didn't affect me, as I only run linux (fedora) on my desktop, and hardly had any issues at that. But recently, when I changed my fstab file to mount a drive at boot, I made a typo. My system wouldn't boot at all and it wouldn't even drop to a shell so I can chroot the file system like you would with init.d. I thought that there's some arcane command I don't know about. But there wasn't. You're locked off, and expected to boot off something else to fix your system. Horrible. Having this said, I honestly expected way more on the section about benefits to users. |
|
I don't know exactly what went wrong in your case, but killing Unix systems by messing with fstab has been a rite of passage for more than four decades. Systemd certainly didn't invent that. Hell, I broke a chromebook not 48 hours ago messing with the boot setup.
But FWIW: managing a recovery image is, amusingly, not historically a job systemd has tried to take on. This is what your live image is for.