|
|
|
|
|
by drooby
1865 days ago
|
|
Again, if you read the article you'd be able to answer these questions. Here's the math: - 2.89 billion hectares of land is used for pasture, one third of which (870 million hectares) is suitable for growing crops. - 538 million hectares is used for growing crops to be eaten by animals. So, by removing meat from our diet we could free up 1.4 billion hectares of land JUST for crop land for human consumption, while allowing the other 2 billion hectares of non arable pasture to reforest - which would have significant impact on carbon sequestration and biodiversity. Keep in mind that 1 billion hectares of land is the size of North America plus Brazil. It is estimated that the entire human population would only need 1 billion hectares of land to survive (on an all plant-based diet). This means that ultimately 3 billion hectares of land could be reforested. The reduction in the farming and food shipping industry's carbon emissions would also have significant impact on reversing climate change. |
|