People shouldn't need an oil company to remind them that what used to be a dwindling resource and now a more threatening "climate risk" could best be addressed either way by extreme conservation, and substitution using less damaging alternatives whenever possible.
Thanks for clarifying. It does make more sense now. They are bribing us with lower costs in order to escape accountability. I can see why they would want to do that.
Less costly energy bills?
People shouldn't need an oil company to remind them that what used to be a dwindling resource and now a more threatening "climate risk" could best be addressed either way by extreme conservation, and substitution using less damaging alternatives whenever possible.