|
|
|
|
|
by Loveaway
1869 days ago
|
|
Well I'd urge you to not be so hastily. This could very well go very badly. There are a lot of unproven, hypothetical, assumptions being made, and a lot of people are completely ignoring any counter argument. Often valid issues simply get deleted, people just don't want to hear it, they don't want to see it, and it scares me to be honest. It's also getting completely impossible to argue against the commitment bias of vaccinated people. You really don't even considered once that injecting spike protein on a regular basis might not be the best thing for you body? This is a harmful protein after all. I don't know, maybe its all fine and good, but if you ask me, I think a lot of people are way too excited to be part of this study. Especially since the risk/reward doesn't seems to be that great in the first place. |
|
We're talking about small amounts here, that aren't replicating. If you have the virus coursing around you get a lot of contact with the real spike protein, which can replicate inside your body.
The body is used to fighting off a lot of viruses and bacteria at the same time. Why would this spike protein, without the attached virus, be different?
After all we can't compare the vaccine to a world without the virus, since we won't get that back. Instead we need to compare the vaccine to the world with the virus.