Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by EFruit 1865 days ago
I'm all for eliminating (re)CAPTCHAs, and I'm glad someone is working on the problem, but this proposal seems a little iffy on a few fronts, with two main areas of concern.

First, I don't like the idea of having Cloudflare as the sole judge of the trusted key set; a more open model like the CA-Browser forum would be much easier to trust, as it helps reduce perverse incentives (for example, forcing token manufacturers to implement/ignore features, block certain platforms, give kickbacks, etc.)

Second, it's hard to support a proposal where a full deployment would require every person on the internet to buy AT LEAST a new security token (from an Approved™ vendor), which may not even be compatible with their platform, or may be impossible to acquire (because of export restrictions, poverty, someone inventing a cryptocurrency that requires a hardware token to mine...)

2 comments

> having Cloudflare as the sole judge of the trusted key set

The article doesn't say so, but the approved vendor list is actually not determined by Cloudflare. They defer to the FIDO Alliance's Metadata Service [0], which maintains a list of certified suppliers.

[0] https://fidoalliance.org/metadata/

Regarding your second point, this is meant to be a CAPTCHA alternative, not full replacement. Users without access to approved devices should be able to fall back to existing proof of personhood mechanisms. It's good to have options!