Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sokoloff 1866 days ago
This is indeed the early experience with BRS, which has been substantially addressed via training which started with some complex scenario-based messaging and later evolved to a more simplified “pull early, pull often” which has resulted in a bias in a better direction for human safety.
1 comments

What's the risk to the people below?

I'm reminded of a 2011 airshow crash of a Red Arrows T1 jet which, at least according to this account, [0] may have involved the pilot heroically making the decision not to personally eject, but to crash the aircraft away from crowded areas, perishing as a result. Of course, the aircraft itself had no parachute, unlike a Cirrus. (Also, I'm uncertain if that account of the incident is consistent with later investigation. The relevant quote is not from any investigation, but from a politician.)

[0] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-14838982

There’s a huge difference in the danger to those on the ground between an 15000 lb fighter jet going hundreds of mph and a small 3000 lb airplane descending at about 15 mph (plus the wind speed).

It’s possible that the Cirrus could hurt or kill someone but I don’t think it’s happened in the about 100 parachute activations so far.

> There’s a huge difference

Of course there is, that's the reason I emphasised it.

> I don’t think it’s happened in the about 100 parachute activations so far

That's good, although there could be a selection effect there: pilots might be more hesitant to deploy it if they think the falling aircraft could do harm.

>What's the risk to the people below?

A lot less than from a plane traveling at terminal velocity!

I mean, would you rather the plane crash at 30mph at a chosen point or at 200mph wherever it leads?
Once you’re under chute, the airplane is picking the arrival spot.
Yes, but you get to choose when you pull the chute, whereas if you lose say, your elevator control, You don't get any choices here.