Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by otterley 1869 days ago
Proof of stake still boils down to availability of resources. With proof of work, it was energy. With proof of stake, it's now energy and materials. If whatever crypto unit is based on proof of stake becomes sufficiently popular, it will eventually approach the incremental price of whatever object is used to build your "stake." Economic theory says that (assuming a competitive market) the selling price of the object should converge upon the incremental cost to produce the object.

Or, to quote Homer Simpson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8Yt4p_gJmY
2 comments
RealityVoid 1869 days ago
> Economic theory says that (assuming a competitive market) the selling price of the object should converge upon the incremental cost to produce the object.

This does not need to apply always. Does money have the value equal to production cost?

link
otterley 1869 days ago
Very few things apply always. Obviously money doesn't, but money is not your garden-variety competitive market like carrots or coal. The only legal suppliers of money are the nation-states that issue it. If you tried to print "money" yourself, it'd most likely be worthless because either nobody would use it (ok, maybe some cryptocurrencies excepted, but for reasons that have more to do with anonymity and a desire to stash illicit savings with a potentially lower probability of forfeiture than anything else), or you'd get in trouble for counterfeiting.
link
RealityVoid 1869 days ago
My point is that this is not a hard rule, and using it to prove something about PoW is on shaky ground.
link
kolinko 1869 days ago
Ditto land and art.
link
onlyrealcuzzo 1869 days ago
You can't produce more land, so there is no marginal cost - and art is literally not competitive - what makes art "art" is that it's unique.
link
otterley 1869 days ago
... or, more commonly, that art is protected by copyright.
link
kolinko 1869 days ago
What you said is not true in case of PoW, and we know it experimentally already - mining costs follow the price of bitcoin, not the other way around. You can look at the charts yourself.
link
otterley 1869 days ago
It makes no sense to try to mine a crypto token if the cost to produce one is greater than its value. Advances in mining technology or the increasing value of crypto can help keep it profitable, but there are diminishing returns to investment in technology, and (one would hope) the value of Bitcoin will eventually stabilize.
link