It's a cynical perspective, but the downvotes are unwarranted. It's worth comparing to McDonalds, where a large proportion of the corporation's worth is in the real estate they hold.
Okay but it's not as if mcdonald's bought the land under false pretenses and now uses it for any purpose since it's theirs. Claiming that the internet access is just a pretense for "land" grabbing when the company neither owns the space afterwards nor can switch businesses to something more nefarious and lucrative with the existing devices... it makes no sense.