Obviously someone who has been working over 30 years less than someone else has significantly less money than them? Do you think the people in the 65-74 age group had the same $266,400 median when they were in the under 35 age group? Of fucking course not, that's idiotic.
Do you think $266,400 will buy a house?
Do you think $13,900 will buy a house?
I understand that you can divide $266,400 over any interval that's convenient, but I don't see how that relates to my point or the facts.