|
|
|
|
|
by bluestreak
1866 days ago
|
|
Query performance would be affected in so far as ingest jobs share the same thread pool as query jobs. As I am writing this I am also realising that perhaps we should have an option to separate these jobs... If we ignore resource usage and commit() latency, query performance would remain unaffected. Reader remains lockless largely unchanged code-wise. This was one of our major objectives to maintain data model as seen by the readers. I hope I'm making sense here? |
|