|
|
|
|
|
by tasssko
1866 days ago
|
|
I don’t think you should pretend you live in a socialist society, progress is made with business and competition. Charging at home is your innovation to replace dependence on fuelling stations. The global super charger network is Teslas competitive advantage against incumbents, its just a simple business strategy and has proved to be a valuable asset. Have you considered the negative externalities of your ICE vehicle? Perhaps the children in the playground breathing in the exhaust fumes are too disconnected from you to care? Imagine if a shell or total decided to convert part of their fuel station franchise to EV Charger networks? High voltage charging could provide enough power to get you home and you can top ip there. Your frustration is probably because the only company that gets it is tesla. Owning any other EV is painful because the consortium based charging networks they created lack standards and maintenance to be relied on. Thanks for your reply, you see competition is working. |
|
There's no need to imagine it. That's what Shell, Total, and BP are doing. And, unlike Tesla, any EV can use their chargers. Some reading:
- https://www.electrive.com/2021/02/12/shell-to-install-half-a...
- https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/technology-news/shell-tar...
- https://www.electrive.com/2021/04/12/shell-reveals-charging-...
- https://www.electrive.com/2021/05/03/charge4europe-and-total...
- https://www.greencarcongress.com/2021/03/20210331-bp.html
- https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/latest-fleet-news/electric-...
- https://freewiretech.com/bp-pulse-and-freewire-sign-exclusiv...
- https://freewiretech.com/news/freewire-deploys-next-generati...
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaSRn6hYOwc
> Your frustration is probably because the only company that gets it is tesla.
No. You're caught up in the marketing and the mythology. You've lost sight of the practical realities.