[unexaminedlife]

The "statistical polling" idea is really just acknowledging the fact that a government (if they put something like this into law) would then of course be required to "uphold that law". So it's just my way of explaining that I think it's FEASIBLE for a government to not only put something like this into law, I think a government could probably enforce it reasonably well.

[torstenvl]

I'm sorry, but you are making it very difficult to follow your train of thought. If you don't want to answer direct clarifying questions, that's fine, but a refusal to answer questions is generally not a sign of trustworthiness. Good luck.

[unexaminedlife]

This is a dialogue my friend. I don't know what prior knowledge you're bringing to the table so I don't know ahead of time how to explain myself. By interacting and asking questions and me answering (and vice-versa) we can hopefully come closer to understanding one another. I'm not trying to dismiss your questions. I probably just need more from you in order to know how to answer them.

EDIT: And that's not to say I'm necessarily "right" about any of what I'm talking about. It's just an idea, and sometimes ideas can be a little complex and nuanced, which can make them even more difficult to explain.