|
|
|
|
|
by 6gvONxR4sf7o
1862 days ago
|
|
He might be a very effective marketer and manager, but he gets credit for so so much more than that. Like he singlehandedly made electric cars a thing. It's the Great Man theory of history. Even then, effective marketing are often lies, so why value effective marketing? Effective management is so often toxic, so why value effective management? As far as I can tell, he's full of BS and his employees are treated poorly, so I really don't care so much that he's first to market. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_man_theory |
|
This is the sort extreme polarised view I was referring to. All I can say is NASA doesn't agree with you on this.
The problem is, if you go straight to "he's full of BS" it just kills all sensible debate. He's clearly not full of BS. He's delivering astronauts to the Space Station via his "startup". This is not something someone "full of BS" achieves.