Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by haxiomic 1867 days ago
Science Publisher Elsevier's reported profit margin is 38%, compared to Apple's 21% – there's lot of cash at stake for them and a big warchest to defend it

For anyone looking to understand the background on the science publishing industry, how it ended up this way and why they will fight Sci-Hub so aggressively, I found this discussion really informative: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PriwCi6SzLo&t=8s&ab_channel=...
1 comments
ma2rten 1867 days ago
I'm wondering why it's only 38%. They charge a lot and mostly work with volunteers. It should not cost 62% of what they charge to run a website to host some pdfs.
link
haxiomic 1867 days ago
It's certainly more tax efficient to reduce your reported profits by finding ways to bury revenue

This is the best breakdown I can find on their parent company RELX: https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/RELX/relx/cash-flo...

link
dagw 1867 days ago
Elsevier is a pretty big company offering lots of different products and services[1]. I suspect even Elsevier is smart enough to see that the current publishing business isn't sustainable and are trying to pivot into something else. The profits from their publishing arm (which is undoubtedly a lot more than 38%) is no doubt financing a lot of that pivoting

[1] https://www.elsevier.com/solutions

link
8note 1867 days ago
Likely some other company in the Cayman islands owns their intellectual property, and they they pay a good portion of their revenue to license it.
link
r_singh 1867 days ago
They invest in making clinic decision support software to make research accessible to doctors, etc (it’s practically also making decisions for them at times).

Source - have attended an Elsevier CDSS Sales presentation for HCPs

link
cbkeller 1867 days ago
Distribution costs are negligible when you just make the PDFs free to everyone, but publishers spend a bunch of money on access control, security, and web interfaces that make you jump through hoops to download the actual PDF while doing everything possible to convince you to read the papers through their (possibly "social"/"collaborative") online platform instead.
link
cblconfederate 1867 days ago
The rest might be laundered somehow.
link