| Oof. Okay. I agree that particular article could have been arranged better. For the curious. Money shot: >Two vehicles smashed into each other and then into a group of people and a lamp post at the intersection at about 1:20 p.m. >According to police, both vehicles were travelling west on Lake Shore Blvd. W. when one vehicle turned left across the path of the other to proceed south on Bay St. So the actual injuries to pedestrians were an example of collateral damage from people screwing up while behind the wheel. The author does embark on a secondary train of thought, highlighting a bit of trivia that people may not know abouut the local traffic regulations: >How pedestrians interpret the newer countdown-type pedestrian signals is becoming a major concern for police, said Const. Hugh Smith of traffic services. Many don’t really understand what the timer means. >Apparently their handbook states that once the countdown starts, they assume no new pedestrians should enter the crosswalk, thereby allowing vehicles to execute turns once the initial group clears. I didn't personally read it as blaming the pedestrians for getting hurt, as it seemed like a more Public Service Announcement sort of thing tacked on the end, but I do agree that that could have been transitioned to or arranged better. I've just been around placeswith some fairly militant anti-motoring sentiment (like do away with all motorways type), so I assure you it is a thing. I think Britain was having some troubles with it in London, and it's growing in popularity around some urban centers in the U.S. It tends to go hand-in-hand with zoning (which is a nightmare in and of itself), and has a great deal of impact on your ability to freely get places in the U.S., which is why I always try to be sensitive to trying to counterweight the "change it now" crowd to "incremental implementation". I don't mind public transit, but I'm very againnst throwing the baby out with the bathwater. |