[tobr]

I’m not convinced by this - “Innovation happens in fields where our ideas are limited by our means to pursue them” - but it’s written as if it’s self-evident. Why would it be like this and what is the argument that it is? By what measure is computing stagnant today compared to the 60’s, for example?

[Frost1x]

I think it's almost a tautology: Innovation happens where... innovation needs to happen.

Which I think is fair. Innovation does also occur where it doesn't necessarily need to.