That reminds me of people who "learn it all on YouTube."
Maybe it's the best option for some people. Not for me, but I do love an audible book.
In conclusion, I think these other mediums simply lack the iterations that we've put into text over the centuries, leaving text as the clear winner in my book.
YouTube is great for things where the directions for the specific activity you want might not include "basic" things someone who knows it well wouldn't think to list in written instructions, or some little technique or movement they do automatically and don't even think about. I love it for house and car DIY stuff, for that reason and also because it makes it clear which parts will be a pain-in-the-ass, and how much, to help me gauge whether I want to do it, or hire it done.
It's also great for technique with tools in the kitchen—not learning recipes so much, but learning the right way to process a certain vegetable really fast, or exactly what a proper whipping motion for eggs ought to look like, or how a pro moves the pan on and off the flame while cooking this dish, exactly what it looks like when they deem a certain cooking technique "done", all of that.
Marshall McLuhan was right to point out that "television" would erode the need for people to read and write.