|
|
|
|
|
|
by enkid
1876 days ago
|
|
|
So, you admit there is such a thing as wire and mail fraud, and those laws should exist, and yet if someone is convicted of those crimes it is automatically because they couldn't convict them of another crime. And you don't know enough about this case to make a judgement and yet the only reason they convicted this person of this crime is because it is "axiomatic." You aren't convincing me these are bad laws from this argument. |
|
|
Read the laws or remain ignorant, I don't care.