[ajays]

(Sorry for replying again) A better analogy would be: you think porting the Linux kernel to a PDP-11 would be a smashing idea (for the PDP-11 enthusiasts out there). So you painstakingly obtain permission from Linus, etc. and get the kernel ported to the PDP-11 architecture. You put the release on a CD, and use a hand-drawn rendition of RedHat's CD cover as your cover (without asking RedHat).

Then RedHat turns around and sues you for violating their copyright.

[micks56]

The PDP-Linux maker should be sued for copyright (and trademark) infringement. Buyers may believe they are getting RedHat Linux because that is what the cover is, but they are not getting Red Hat Linux.

Once again, the programmer's work is sacred and we need Linus's permission, but an artist who creates cover art did trivial work and deserves no protection.