[JoshTriplett]

Any improvement to lifespan will necessarily improve healthy lifespan.

(And for my part, I'll always take those extra 40 years, no matter the condition, because that's 40 more years for medical science to advance and solve more of those problems.)

[fooperdupes]

In my experience this reflexive "more is better" attitude only leads to unhappiness. the more I've abandoned this kind of thinking, the better my quality of life has become.

[AnimalMuppet]

> Any improvement to lifespan will necessarily improve healthy lifespan.

Will it? I don't see why it necessarily will do so.

And even if it does... if it gives you 10 more healthy years, and then 20 more bedridden years, for a net gain of 30 years, is that really a gain? Or do the 20 bedridden years make the 10 healthy years not worth it?

[JoshTriplett]

Many of the same things affecting lifespan are the same things that cause age-related degeneration. Any medical improvement to lifespan will almost certainly be an improvement to health. (There are non-medical things that could improve average lifespan without substantially improving average health, such as reducing causes of fatal accidents, but those wouldn't improve maximum lifespan, only average lifespan.)

And yes, of course it's a gain. You could always choose not to take those extra years, if you really don't want them. It's good to have that possibility available.