Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by polynomial 5468 days ago
except that it applies to any base-n system. It's an artifact of the underlying system, not the base value.
1 comments

What about base-e?
That's just silly. On the other hand, base 2i would be very efficient: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quater-imaginary_base
Really, why don't we have a transcendental numbering system? Also, I can't imagine it could make our financial markets any more irrational.