|
|
|
|
|
by capableweb
1872 days ago
|
|
I think GP is specifically complaining about "Docker Desktop" (the GUI), not "Docker" (the service) itself. Here are some alternative GUIs for managing Docker: https://www.cloudbees.com/blog/docker-guis/ Otherwise, VMs are usually overlooked as an alternative to "docker images", most probably because many people entered the industry after docker images became popular, and they don't know anything else. If you design it properly, stick with establish technology like QEMU, you can have the same environment without having to touch docker at all. |
|
That said, swapping from Docker to VMs for things is nowhere near as simple or straightforward.
The near-frictionless ability to stand up/tear-down a 'known' good image and configuration, with the ability to swap in/out networking, volume or other environmental configuration is what made Docker so popular.
We use Docker containers for a wide range of things, and while we could reproduce all of that as VMs - it would take a lot more effort, and it would introduce a lot more delays waiting to build/replace a VM.