|
|
|
|
|
by azalemeth
1880 days ago
|
|
Unfortunately, compared to cross-platform Foss and more capable alternatives such as kicad, this is a pass from me. What does this offer that others do not -- what is its USP? Does it work well under wine, something that other commercial competitors (e.g. dip trace) makes use of? |
|
Tools like KiCad, Eagle, OrCAD the schematic capture entry "the drawing part" is kinda the least interesting part of the program. While there is an art to nicely designed schematics, especially analog/RF, most schematics in industry for densely populated boards are mostly just lots of blobs with net references - as an input into the next step of board design and footprint management. Ie its more CAM than CAD.