|
|
|
|
|
|
by adrianscott
5470 days ago
|
|
|
"So in this case, where the FBI is involve, using a SHA-1 hash poses no extra security vulnerability." meeeh... remember the fbi is not a person, it's an organization. the org can have bad actors in it who might be able to access the encrypted passwords but not be able to confiscate servers. also, confiscating a server(s) is much more visible / detectable... |
|
|