|
|
|
|
|
by Someone
1880 days ago
|
|
Yeah, that “left as an exercise” was tongue-in-cheek. Even past executions do not tell you much. Change “n=10” to “n=12”, and who knows what will happen to execution times? The code might be O(n⁴), or contain an “if n=12” clause. Looking at the world’s best best reactive system, I think it never automatically fetches external data, and only recalculates stuff it knows it can cancel, and also has a decent idea about how much time each step will take. Now that Excel has lambdas, that latter part has gone. You can write an Ackermann function in it (https://www.spreadsheetweb.com/how-to-calculate-the-ackerman...) |
|