|
|
|
|
|
by lhnz
1884 days ago
|
|
Let's talk concretely about the consequence that is most fraught. Should employees be fired for expressing political positions at work that their employer disagrees with? Should all employees be told to focus on their companies mission instead? Previously progressives seemed happy for the former to happen, but now they seem annoyed that they also might have their free speech squashed. What kind of consequences are acceptable? |
|
What might have some support is the idea that an employer could fire someone holding positions that are incompatible with the majority of other employees. We can argue about the best way to regulate this, but it's a different and horizontal view of determining the boundaries of civil coexistence.