|
|
|
|
|
by shkkmo
1885 days ago
|
|
I think you were a bit lax on the kon-tiki hypothesis. It didn't just posit the west-to-east colonization of Polynesia from South America, but that this was done be white-people originating in the middle east. So while there is genetic evidence for contact between South America and Polynesia, that evidence is also evidence against the Kon-Tiki hypothesis. |
|
One is what Egyptians traveled to South America. That was his Ra Expedition.
Another is that people traveled from South America to Polynesia. His Kon-Tiki expedition.
You are saying: (1) Ra is wrong (2) Kon-Tiki is right (3) Because Ra is wrong Kon-Tiki is also wrong.
I do not understand how you can at the same time believe (2) and (3).