|
|
|
|
|
|
by throwaway3699
1883 days ago
|
|
|
How would socialism have dealt with the first scenario? My understanding is there simply wasn't enough food to go around, and no economic system can fix that. Capitalism at least provides a profit motive to solve the problem (eventually). The Bengal famine was a top down project specifically designed to profit. There is no "free market capitalism" in that scenario. |
|
|