[frombody]

the ad-fraud accusation is my biggest concern as well.

they provide no information or clues leaving the author to guess.

the author guesses that somehow someone extracted their identifiers from the apk.

google comes back and says more clearly that it's something to do with how the ads are positioned, essentially accusing them of trying to trick people to accidentally click.

this information should have been provided before the appeal, and google gains literally nothing from hiding this information from the author.

the malware claims have more validity, but the way they handled the ad-fraud claim is inexcusable.

[judge2020]

Ad fraud will just fix their errors if Google provides any information about how it detected the ad fraud. They're fine with some false positives if it means 99%+ of ad fraud is squashed.