|
|
|
|
|
|
by tomnipotent
1879 days ago
|
|
|
> probably didn't exist Except the language in the contract had always been deceptive, regardless of whether they were legally compelled to remove it. Lambda made a conscious decision to mislead customers for their own financial benefit, knowing full well that they were not covered by Section 523(a)(8). They don't deserve credit for removing the language. |
|
|