[RaceWon]

>> to level the field even more, I think the FIA should require teams to release the design of their computer hardware after X time.

But that is Not what Formula One is about... it is Not a Spec series where the cars are equal to each other. It is a competition where each team builds their own race car to compete against the other iterations of race cars built by the opposing teams. It is Not meant to be fair or equitable. We have Indycar and NASCAR for that.

Ditto with the drivers: Is Max or Lewis comparable to say a Mazepin or even a Hulkenberg? No they are Not.

It's a Spectacle, it's a Circus... that is what F1 is about. And I tell you, as a racer there is nothing else that is its equal in terms of pure audacity both from a standpoint of driving talent and car performance.

[capableweb]

F1 is definitely trying to make the teams and their engineering more similar than different, why do you think the whole regulation part exists even? [1] If they were to be allowed to build whatever they want, F1 would have looked very different than how it looks today.

F1 (FIA really) has been using regulation to improve the sports safety, but lately they also used regulation in order to regulate how much each team spends on engineering, both money-wise and time-wise. This is to make things more equal between the teams.

- [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formula_One_regulations#Techni...

[RaceWon]

>> F1 is definitely trying to make the teams and their engineering more similar than different, why do you think the whole regulation part exists even?

I agree, especially under the new owners. And for sure the cars are built according to each teams interpretation of the rules (which are of course subject to scrutineering). But that still leaves massive room for innovation.

Lewis is sitting in the same cockpit as Bottas is... their results are frequently vastly different due to their individual interpretation of events.