[k_bx]

I don’t know how Swift works, but from my Haskell experience, if your language needs async/await —- it’s already failing. Everything is async in Haskell, so you don’t need to think about it, and cannot accidentally make a mistake by blocking your async thread by calling sync code from it.

[nextaccountic]

> Everything is async in Haskell, so you don’t need to think about it,

Then why does https://hackage.haskell.org/package/async exist?

[eecc]

I think what he means is that everything in Haskell is "async" because the language runtime is lazy and types can encode parallelism: monads and functors fro sequential, blocking code, while applicatives for independent code.

Not sure if it's actually correct though.

[k_bx]

Nothing to do with laziness. It just means you cannot accidentally call blocking (sync) operation from a lightweight (async) thread and block a whole bunch of other lightweight threads like in Rust, C#, or other languages with explicit “async” keyword

[k_bx]

Please keep in mind it’s a library, not a language extension. It exists same reason any other library exists. It’s a useful set of combinators