|
|
|
|
|
by cbmuser
1888 days ago
|
|
> Wind, solar, and hydro coupled with transcontinental UHV power transmission could solve it with much simpler technologies. Belarus just built a single nuclear power plant that reduces their natural gas consumption in the energy sector by 25% and saves 7 million tons of CO2 annually: > https://twitter.com/RosatomGlobal/status/1323580827377258507 Just imagine how many wind and solar farms you would need to achieve that. And, remember, neither wind mor solar provide baseload. |
|
Southern Belarus seems to be pretty well suited for solar power too, which might even be a little bit cheaper than wind turbines.
Nuclear is not terrible for saving CO2, but the benefits are not as dramatic as you make them seem.