|
|
|
|
|
by jimsug
1885 days ago
|
|
Agree that it could be seen as excessive, but this was not just in response to these commits, but also to the university's failure to act once they were informed of them. They university, and indeed, the researchers, only acted once the ban was imposed - i.e. they were getting away with it without reputational damage, and only once it was stained did they actually do anything. |
|