|
|
|
|
|
by dv_dt
1886 days ago
|
|
For things that are private goods, it's fine to have a process of elimination - but only if that elimination doesn't leave even more public obligations to clean up (like pollution). However the post office is a public good, so just letting it disappear is something that needs to be prefaced by an actual public discussion to do so. |
|
Not really. Budgeted government programs can’t continue to exist without money. They are default dying without top-ups.