Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by soperj 1884 days ago
How in any way is that misleading?

The actual numbers are more representative than lethality percentages when we're talking about contribution to society.

1 comments

What's more representative is "life years lost", and malaria wins there (we've lost many more years to it).
How do you calculate that in an area of the world with the highest rate of child mortality?
Same as in any other area, assume malaria isn't killing babies and do the math. Your question sounds rhetorical but is too simple to answer, so I'm confused.