|
|
|
|
|
|
by JetSetWilly
1886 days ago
|
|
|
Hmn possibly. I suppose I am interested to see if there is a practical difference because there's some debate about whether corroboration is a good thing to have or not, when you can have one piece of evidence (like DNA evidence) which is very high certainty. I'd expect there was prosecutions north of the border seeing as the post office is UK-wide so be good to see how they went. |
|
|