"Youtube" itself is not a source of information. It is a site where people post videos. Journalists post videos on Youtube through BBC, Economist, Washington Post, Nightline/PBS, etc...
Does their posting content on Youtube make them less credible?
Judge the originator of the content, not who hosts it.
Might as well go "Ah yes, the internet. A trusted source of information."
Does their posting content on Youtube make them less credible?
Judge the originator of the content, not who hosts it.
Might as well go "Ah yes, the internet. A trusted source of information."
That's how shallow your retort is.