|
|
|
|
|
|
by xpasky
1881 days ago
|
|
|
Wow, that paper is super strange! The outcome of visual check not adding any value to single entry seems incredibly surprising, yet besides all the fancy statistics in the paper, the authors made no attempt at all to investigate this surprising outcome further and hunt for an explanation. (The easiest experiment - try to see based on total time whether the participants didn't cheat; UX might have been an issue; ...) |
|
|